Evolution is a rats nest of arguments and emotions in the Christian world. I've heard sermons and teachings on how terrible and undermining it can be to the Christian message. In more recent years, I've viewed these kinds of teachings with no small amount of eye-rolling and irritation.
It started years ago. I got to a place in my walk with Christ when I realized: I don't care if God created the world in six days or six trillion. It's the same God to me, and however he did it is fine by me. I harbored a mistrust of science and scientists in general, believing they were too sure of their interpretations of data, which seemed to change drastically every decade or so. I still carry such suspicions, but I've come to accept that the current science on any given topic is, for the most part, our best understanding so far, and this includes evolution. I have no trouble incorporating that notion into the mystery of creation, the majesty of design, and the supremacy of God's plan. Viewing it all with the very hand of God in mind, it's amazing.
Over a year ago, a man gave a sermon in which he mentioned evolution, claiming it was destructive and offensive to God. "If we came from monkeys," he said, "then there's nothing special about us." In my mind, the plan of God in the Bible does indicate that there is something special about humanity, but this man was claiming that our connection to apes made us somehow less special, less than human, less than--if you will--children of God. When he said that, I thought, "No. If we came from monkeys, that just means there's something really special about monkeys." This opened the door to me for all kinds of thoughts--amazing thoughts--about our connection to the world, the blessedness of all of creation, from stars and planets and black holes to algae and fungus and lizards and apes... and us. Does it bother you that we're "just monkeys." Because it amazes me that maybe even monkeys aren't "just monkeys."
But I couldn't stop there. Amazement is a good place to start, but then the theology was begging to be explored. I went to Utah's Natural History Museum and explored the geological scientific reconstructed history of earth. I encountered dinosaur bones and ancient human tools with fresh eyes and wondered about what it all meant. And this disturbed me for a while, and still does. Because what does it all mean? It's one thing to marvel at God's creation, the progression of new life after new life, but what do hundreds of millions of years of evolution really mean? Can we believe that they were all really just a long convoluted path to get to us? Humans?
And then more thoughts disturbed me. What about the ages and ages of animals, of predator and prey, of life and death, of eating and being eaten, an endless cycle of creation and destruction, of ice, fire and flood? What did it all mean? And what does it do to the actual message of Genesis. Forget the seven days and the sabbath (important in its own right) and think about what the creation story of Genesis really means. It means God created humans to be like himself--special. It means that God gave form and order to a chaotic mass of atoms. He made the heavens and the earth. And it means that he found it all to be good. But what do we think of that message in the light of evolution? I found myself at a loss. I don't know what that means. I don't know what God was doing with those hundreds of millions of years. And what of the garden of Eden story. If we know now that plants and animals were dying, were devouring each other, were caught in cycles of violence, went extinct and were lost to memory, what does that do to our understanding of sin. We say that death comes from sin, and that sin came to the world through the disobedience of Adam and Eve. Sure, it might just be a story, and maybe Eve wasn't really made from Adam's rib, and they didn't actually walk in a real garden completely content, but the story still has a meaning without all of that being exactly true. The real question is, what is that meaning really? And what is the meaning of evolution? Are they in conflict? I have not seen anyone tackling these questions. Theistic Evolutionists seem content to rejoice in their newfound amazement at God's marvelous plan with evolution, while the rest of the Christian world rails about the literal interpretation of what they consider a completely perfect book. Neither side seems ready to even think about all the implications that embracing evolution might have, and whether those implications are worthwhile or not.
Monday, September 23, 2013
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Time With God
In my last sermon, I talked about the principles to keep in
mind as we work on this messy life of discipleship and life with God. Now I’d
like to talk more specifically about the methods we employ to reinforce these
principles. I’ve been involved in different churches with different
philosophies. Some stress bible reading and prayer. Others stress service and
giving. Different churches suggest different avenues of life with God, many of
which are amazing and good, but many of us wonder where to start. Some of us
have done it all and still feel like children of faith, so what do we have to
fall back on.
Let me first repeat what I’ve said before: a method is not a
guarantee of success, any more than having the right tractor is a guarantee of
a bountiful harvest. Even less is your method in any way a measure of your
success. Success, in this life with God, actually comes from God. It says in
Mark 4:
“This is what
the kingdom of God is like. A man scatters seed on the ground. Night and day,
whether he sleeps or gets up, the seed sprouts and grows, though he does not
know how. All by itself the soil produces grain—first the stalk, then the head,
then the full kernel in the head. As soon as the grain is ripe, he puts the
sickle to it, because the harvest has come.”
This is not the full story, but it is a
major part of it. We need to remember first and foremost that growth comes from
God. We can’t manufacture it. We can only nurture it. For this reason, I
believe that our first priority is to go to God. Spend time with him. Talk to
him. Sit still and try to listen to him. There are two sisters who are friends
with Jesus, and in one of the stories in the gospels, the two sisters, Mary and
Martha, choose different ways of relating with Jesus. Martha works her butt off
to make sure everything goes perfectly, just like a dutiful hostess should.
Mary lazily sits at Jesus’s feet and gets to just listen to the things he says
and spend time with him. If you think about it, Mary’s not being a very good
sister or a very good host, but when Martha comes in to scold Mary for just
sitting around, Jesus contradicts her. It was in fact Martha who was too
concerned with doing, and Mary who had chosen what is better.
This story is clearly not meant to teach
people to be lazy and skip out on their chores. But it is setting a higher
priority. Sitting still, listening, waiting, and spending time with God come
first.
My college professor, Scot McKnight,
said some things about the Sabbath that I really appreciated. He said that in
our Western culture we think of the Sabbath as a time to get ready for the work
week. We’ve moved Sabbath to the beginning of the week, and made it about
gearing up for the all the work that needs to be done. But when the Jewish
rabbis talked about the Sabbath, it was not something to get you prepared for
what’s next—it was the day that you looked forward to. You work all week long,
and then finally—the holy Sabbath: rest; joy; deep, luxuriating breaths; time
and more time; time to spend with God, worshiping and celebrating. In our
culture we’ve idolized work. We’ve prioritized doing above all else. But the
way of Jesus prioritizes stillness, rest, listening, and quality time. Our time
with God is something to look forward to. And yes, it should help us get
through all the work we have to do. In fact, the more work we have to do, the
more we need to spend time with God. But let’s not forget that our time with
God is the time to look forward to. Psalm 42:2 says, “My soul thirsts
for God, for the living God. When can I go and meet with God?” Our souls are
thirsty, so we need to give them time to drink.
With all this in mind, then, my first method for growth and
discipleship is to spend time with God each day. Can you spend time with God
while doing the dishes? Yeah. While at your job? Sure. Playing games, running a
marathon, chatting with friends, walking your dog? Yes, of course. God is all
around us and I encourage including him in all your time, all your activities.
But there is something refreshing and foundational in taking time out of each
day to be still, to do nothing, to quiet your mind and just listen. When you
take time out of your day to be with God alone, there is both great joy and
great power in that.
Let me delve deeper into this time with God, because I think
a lot of us are confused. A lot of us might see this as a chore or a duty. We
might sit still and pray and meditate and read the bible and journal and do all
the things that we’ve been told should help, but we sit in confusion, and our
stillness turns to frustration. Our prayers feel hollow. Our souls feel empty.
They don’t always feel thirsty, nor do they feel like they’re getting a drink.
Are we doing it wrong?
Well, to put it a little too simply, yes. Yes we’re doing it
wrong, because we’re doing it for the wrong reasons and with the wrong attitude
or disposition. There are different ways of spending time with God. I
personally feel a strong benefit from meditation and often from prayer, but it
might help some to write down their thoughts or to read a passage from the
bible or from another inspiring piece of literature, and some might prefer to
go for a walk. The important thing is to employ the method that works for you
and then work to fix your mindset. Our mindset, our attitude, our disposition:
these things are what make our time with God worthwhile. It’s very much like if
you spend time with another person. Not everyone you meet is someone you’re
going to want to open up to. And you might not want to spill your guts to
someone every time you meet them, but this is not just any someone. This is the
one who made you and who loves you unconditionally. You don’t always have to
talk, but you do have to open your heart. You do have to believe that this is a
person that you like, a being that you trust. We come to God with the mindset
that our whole selves are laid bare before him. If we don’t, we end up doing
the same thing we do with people we don’t even like. We put up walls. We don’t
let them in. We emphasize our personal space, and maybe we stick our foot out a
little so they can’t creep too close. We’re uncomfortable. Sometimes you find
yourself feeling that way about God. If so, it’s important to figure out why
you feel that way. Chances are, you’re either believing something about God
that’s not true, or you’re hiding something from God that he already knows, but
you don’t want to talk about, or both of these.
The important thing here is to keep in mind the principles
that I went over n my last sermon—primarily, the principle of awareness. Spending
time with God (if we can manage to be still and really connect with him) can
help us to become aware of God and of our own attitudes, dispositions, and
thought patterns. This awareness alone is sometimes enough to hold back that
temper or work harder at kindness and generosity when the opportunity arises.
But let me also present a warning here. If you are new to this, and you start
meditating or praying every day, you are going to feel some resistance at first—hard
resistance. If anger is a problem in your life, it’s going to seem like you’re
getting angry all the time. If you’re proud or selfish, you’re going to
experience those problems all the more. As they say, sometimes it has to get
worse before it gets better. This is a natural outcome for a couple of reasons.
First of all, sometimes our minds prefer the status quo. It’s like when you
start going on a diet, and for the first couple of days you feel really extra
hungry all the time. Your brain is trying to get your body to stay the same,
and you may have to force it to change. After the first few days, the diet
might become routine and the hunger pangs might leave you alone. Secondly, if
you’re increasing your awareness, you are suddenly opening yourself up to your
true state of mind. It may feel like you’re getting angry more often, only
because you notice it that much more. Your awareness, and your connection with
God, are bringing your faults and struggles to the forefront of your attention.
It is vital at this time that you apply the principle I
mentioned in my last sermon: do not give up. You need to turn things around in
your mind. When we try to change and meet such resistance, we often take it as
a sign that we’re on the wrong track, that what we’re trying out just isn’t
going to work. We might think we were better off before. Don’t believe it. Also
apply the other principle, be malleable. Be changeable. Try to think of these experiences
as opportunities instead of hardships. Your connection with God has brought you
an opportunity to overcome a chronic problem in your life. You’re seeing
something for what it is and has been for some time. Embrace this chance that
you have to turn things around. Rejoice, because God is working in your life.
It is not a sign of failure or a misstep. It’s a clear sign that you’ve stepped
off the wide and easy path in search of the narrow one. Stepping off the path
we’re used to is always going to feel difficult. Learn to enjoy the challenges
that come your way, and don’t give up.
Hopefully, this has helped a bit. I do not recommend any one
method as a blanket prescription for all Christ followers, but I do recommend a
daily time with God. Feel free to experiment. Try out different things. The
important thing is to renew your mind, quiet your heart, and enjoy your time with
God. It is a blessing that many followers of Jesus have experienced, and from
which anyone can benefit. There are, of course, many things that God’s people
can do to live in discipleship, most of which are obvious, but I suggest a
daily time with God as the best place to start. After that, let him guide you
into the work that is right for you.
Saturday, May 18, 2013
It's Messy
Last time, I talked about discipleship, and how we all seem
to be struggling with it. We all seem to be stuck in our ruts, making the same
mistakes over and over, wallowing in guilt and insecurity. I myself have
experienced these issues over and over. Sometimes I pull away from them.
Sometimes I get deeper into despair and fruitlessness.
I don’t want to over-generalize. I think it is very helpful
for us to remember, that not everybody is in this sorry state of helpless
struggle. I myself sometimes read passages in the Bible that speak of
overcoming and the power to live life with God, and I wonder why none of us are
really there. But there’s yet another false assumption. Though many of us do
struggle, a few people, scattered among the churches, are actually doing really
well. They are actively involved with God and thriving in the way of Jesus.
They have their own struggles, too, but let’s not get into the trap of
believing it’s utterly hopeless and pointless to even try.
But here we are, many of us struggling day after day,
sometimes doing well, and sometimes horrible. And many Christians are out there
looking for the magic key that will make their spiritual lives take off. We
want a formula, some kind of pill would be nice. A simple A + B = C, which equals
new life in Christ. And you’ll hear sermon after sermon and attend conference
after conference and read book after cheesy Christian book that will try to
tell you the secret, the magic formula that will make it all better. These
formulas range from a simple “trust in Jesus” to some complicated steps you
have to take. And you try one thing after another, from daily devotions to
small groups to service projects to incense burning, to anything you can think
of to change your way of life permanently, but they often grow stale and
ineffectual.
Perhaps you’ll think of this as bad news, or maybe it’s
good, but the fact is that there is no formula. There are always steps you can
take that will help, but nothing guarantees growth. There’s no magic key to
making it all work right. It’s a messy life filled with ups and downs and we
can’t flip a switch and become the complete people of God we’ve been longing to
be. There is no switch. It’s just… life.
That being said, there are a few principles to hold on to
and a few practices to master, which should help greatly in living life with
God. Jesus often used agricultural metaphors, and I think it is in part because
life works a lot like working the land. You need to work hard and give your
crops lots of attention, if you want them to grow, but you also need rain and
sunshine and good soil. You might be the hardest-working farmer alive, but if there’s a
drought, you’re going to have a tough time of it. A farmer knows these things
and has always historically sought God or gods for his/their blessing to send
rain and sun and everything they need for the crop to survive. We do the same
in life, knowing that times of drought or flood may come, yet seeking God for
his help nonetheless—and at the same time, we must do our part to live by the
principles we hold dear.
First of these principles, in my mind, is that this is a
life with God. More than trying to do your duty to try and curry favor with
God, more even than trusting in God to take care of you, The way of life
following Jesus is about living life with
God. There are a lot of us who struggle with this, and it could take many
sermons to tell people all about life with God, and if you’re asking yourself,
“what does that even mean?” then you’re not alone. To me, living life with God
is about quieting my mind and my heart. I acknowledge that there is a divine
power all around me and in me and I try to adjust my disposition to be open to
that divine power. It’s not always about talking or doing certain things, but
it is about an awareness. Learning to cultivate that awareness can take a
lifetime in itself, but that’s the gist of it.
Next of these principles is to be malleable. Sometimes it’s
hard for us to recognize if God is trying to tell us something or if we’re just
arguing with ourselves. Whatever the case, it’s important to remember that God
is involved in some way, and so we need to be ready to change our hearts and
minds at any moment. If you’re like me, you’ll have found yourself in
emotionally destructive or divisive cycles. You’ll be angry and think you have
every right to be. You’ll get depressed or bitter or selfish or proud or
abrasive or rude, and it always feels logical, natural, maybe unavoidable.
Usually, it is none of these things. And so we need to affix in our minds that
we might be wrong at any time and be ready and open to changing our minds and
attitudes. You’ll often find if you can maintain this openness to correction
and readiness to shift gears, that you’re going to encounter less and less of
these cycles anyway. But it is again about awareness. We need to cultivate
awareness of ourselves, of our emotional states and of our disposition. If we
don’t, we’ll most certainly fall victim to these little traps.
Next is a simple idea that everyone knows but tends to
ignore or forget: Don’t give up. For me realization hits maybe a month later,
when I realized I got tired of trying, got stuck in a rut, started thinking,
feeling, talking and acting like none of it mattered anymore. And I look back
and wonder how I got to where I was, because I didn’t notice. But my state of
mind and life tells me that somewhere along the way I did give up. We don’t
always recognize this for what it is. We might just call it a rough spot. But
again, the issue comes down to awareness. Do you know when it is that you’re
hitting a wall? Can you tell, when things start going south? If we maintain an
awareness of where we’re at, we can intercede sooner in the process. But this in itself requires vigilance.
Sometimes it seems like a catch 22, but hold onto the principle, Don’t Give Up,
and that should at least help.
Finally, the last principle is possibly the most important:
Grace. First, have grace for yourself. Too many Christians get bogged down in
guilt. It is certainly better to humble yourself than to exalt yourself, but
the way of Jesus was never intended to keep people in a perpetual state of
miserable shame and guilt, constantly beating our breast and begging God to
forgive us for our feeble attempts to do good. Give yourself some grace, and
give others some, too.
In my last sermon I talked about the fact that we sometimes
mistake the method for the goal. The goal, if you might recall, is to be like
Christ, bear spiritual fruit (love, joy, peace, patience, etc.), and live life
with God. There are many methods we can employ to attain this goal. But the
methods are not the goal themselves. The methods we use can help us support the
aforementioned principles, which should help us reach our goals.Since this is already running long, I'll focus on methods in my next sermon.
For now let me sum up:
It's a messy life with God. There is no secret formula for getting it all right. All we have is the goal of new life in Christ. Attaining this goal requires that we hold on to certain principles and cultivate an awareness of God and of ourselves.
If you find that you go through a whole day without asking yourself how you're doing, where's God and what's he doing, or any type of question that might cultivate your awareness, then in my opinion, that's the place to start.
I'll end with a favorite quote of mine from C.S. Lewis:
"The gods cannot speak to men face to face, til we have faces."
A little cryptic, I know, but try to puzzle it out. Or just read the book ("Til We Have Faces").
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Coming Soon
This week's new sermon, entitled "It's Messy," will be ready soon. Frankly, I'm talking about how we're supposed to live with God in discipleship successfully, a question I'm hardly qualified to answer, but one which I think I have a lot to say about anyway. It's taking a lot of consideration, but I should be finished tomorrow or Friday. Thanks.
Monday, May 06, 2013
Discipleship Vs. Evangelism
I wanted to respond to some things in Sunday’s sermon, because I believe there’s a lot of
stuff there worth discussing, and I have a few objections to some of the
assumptions inherent in the message.
The pastor on Sunday referred to an issue that a lot of
churches seem to have in leaning too heavily in favor of discipleship or on
evangelism, either way to the detriment of the other. In other words, it seems
like a church is either really good at evangelism and really bad at
discipleship, or vice-versa.
The
assumption here is really that evangelism and discipleship can be two
essentially separate things. I see this as a false assumption which creates a
false dichotomy.
We get this messed up, when we don’t fully understand what
it means to be engaged in discipleship and when we don’t have a true, wholesome
sense of the importance of “good news.”
Let’s first take a look at discipleship:
I’m going to start with my experience of discipleship as I
grew up, because I think it’s similar to what we think of today.
The way I remember it in my church, to focus on discipleship
was to learn church doctrines, participate in bible studies and daily personal
devotions, and to understand more of God’s love and how we’re supposed to live.
There are some very good things about this understanding of discipleship. I
still believe spending time with God is essential to daily living life in his
way, and the Bible is still a great instrument for hearing God’s voice and
understanding his will. Unfortunately, measuring
“spiritual growth” in this setting is confusing at best. There is a large
emphasis on head knowledge, doctrines and dogmas. And I’ve known enough people
who have a lot of knowledge of doctrines and a lot of smart things to say about
God and life, who have little to show for it in terms of spiritual fruit (love,
joy, peace, patience, etc.). Unfortunately, I can often put myself in that
category. Discipleship, for too many churches, is about adherence to some
understanding of truth, and can often be measured on a checklist, somewhat akin
to the Nicean Creed. Do you believe in the Trinity? Can you ever lose your Salvation?
How do you understand God’s Sovereignty? What’s going to happen in the future?
Your answers to these and other questions can often be the primary focus when
you get down to measuring your spiritual growth. When it comes to actions, we
ask: are you spending time In prayer and bible reading? Are you giving money to
the Church? Are you actively serving at a church? These are all activities that
are designed to help produce the fruit of love and kindness and gentleness and
patience, but instead they become the standard themselves. These activities
become our checklist. I read my Bible this morning. Nevermind that I went to
work and chewed out my coworkers and mocked my boss on the internet and then
got home and yelled at my kids, etc. Do I look back at my day and say that I’ve
grown spiritually, that I learned about kindness, patience, and grace?
When Jesus practiced discipleship, he lived with people. He
taught them every day, correcting them, rebuking them, eating with them, loving
them. And the things he taught them had little to do with doctrines and much
more to do with actions: love your neighbor; love your enemies; forgive your
brother every time he repents; even if it’s several times in one day; don’t
judge others, or you’re going to be judged in the same way, for the same thing;
guard your thoughts and your hearts; the first will be last—don’t put yourself
above everyone else, but be a servant instead; be ready to face persecutions
and trials; have faith, even just the faith of a mustard seed; and the list
goes on. How do we measure whether we’re living up to these standards? How do
we measure spiritual fruit? How do you measure love or peace or joy? You can’t
collect them like a bushel of apples and say, “Look! I’ve got 126 apples this
year. That’s 25 more than last year, so I must be doing pretty well.” And yet,
we do need to look at discipleship and spiritual growth more like an orchard or
a farm or a garden than the way we currently look at it, like a philosophy test
in school.
We’re going to come back to that. But for now let’s just
acknowledge that measuring our discipleship is going to be a tricky thing. It’s
not going to be black and white. It’s not going to be very mathematical.
Now let’s go to evangelism. It really gets me to hear people
say that a church can be poor in discipleship, but really great with
evangelism. I have a hard time understanding what this means. And I almost
always have a deep suspicion about the nature of the evangelism taking place.
Evangelism is about “Good news.” That’s its definition. I find it hard to
believe that a people who are not growing in love, joy, peace, patience,
generosity, understanding, grace, and gentleness with one another can have any
really great thing to say to the rest of the world about any sort of Good News.
Instead, such people seem more intent on converting people
to their belief system than to sharing good news. It often becomes clear in the
nature of their message. “You’re going to hell, and you’d better believe in
Jesus if you want to go to heaven instead,” is not good news. “Human beings are
all wretched, worthless sinners in need of God’s grace,” is also not good news.
Instead of sharing good news, people who go out in the world with these views
in mind seem more interested in sharing very disturbing, troubling news. They
need to convince everyone about what bad shape they’re in before they spring
the good news that now they’d better change their ways and turn to God for
forgiveness.
Others know it’s more than that, and they really believe there is
something to be excited about, but they don’t always feel it or know what it
really is. They can say it. “It’s new life.” “it’s hope of resurrection.” “It’s
forgiveness and freedom.” But have they experienced it? Can we share about
peace with God, when we’ve never or only rarely known the peace of God that
passes all understanding? Can we share about the forgiveness and embrace of
God, if we’ve not learned to forgive our neighbors? We might have good news of
new life in Christ, but what are we really talking about if we’re not living
it? You can’t have excellent, amazing evangelism, without solid discipleship. Without
good discipleship, you have a whole lot of enthusiasm without a lot of
substance. Often you have a whole lot of empty words, and at best the
appearance of hypocrisy. There is no such thing as good evangelism without good
discipleship.
So what does this mean for us? Does this mean we don’t tell
anyone about Jesus unless we’ve somehow made it? Do we spread the good news,
only when we’ve achieved perfection? Of course that can’t be right, otherwise
nobody would ever hear about Christ. Yes, we are a work in progress. Yes, the
fruit of the spirit is going to take time, we’ll only see gradual progress, and
we will probably never know the completion of being in Christ in this life. And
yet… and yet evangelism has to be a natural outpouring of discipleship. It is
ludicrous to spread the word of abundant life without having at least some
experience of that life.
When I waited tables at a restaurant, our trainers were
always diligent to give us a meal during training. Whenever the restaurant
added a new item to the menu, there would be a few days of trying it out first,
and the waiters would all get samples to taste. The reason was obvious: they
wanted us to sell the product effectively. Unless you’re a good liar, you’re
not going to be able to effectively sell a product you’ve never tried. You can’t
tell people it’s your favorite thing on the menu, if you’ve never tasted it.
When people asked about items that I hadn’t tasted, the best I could tell them
was, “yeah, lots of people like it.” Hmm… That’s not really the most hearty
endorsement. If you’re telling people about Jesus and don’t know what it means
to be forgiven or to love your neighbor or to be kind and gentle or to control
your anger, then you have the same problem as a waiter who’s never tasted the
food. Either you’re a liar… or you tell people how much other people have
benefited from knowing Jesus.
You have to be a disciple of Jesus, to live a life whose trajectory
is in the way of Jesus, if you ever want to genuinely spread good news. Earlier
I said that there’s no such thing as good evangelism with poor discipleship.
The converse is also true. You can’t have good discipleship and bad evangelism.
And I don’t mean that the discipleship is bad simply because it doesn’t include
learning to spread the word. I mean that good discipleship produces good fruit,
and good fruit wants to be shared. It doesn’t take courage to share something
wonderful. Ever since I first tasted Honeycrisp apples, I’ve been telling
people that they’re the best, that they’re the most delicious apple you can
ever try. If people disagree with me I rant about how wrong they are and have trouble
believing they’ve actually tried them. If you’re experiencing new life, the
natural result is to share it. It doesn’t take courage. So when we hesitate to
tell people about our new life with Christ, the problem is not a lack of
courage, but a lack of discipleship, which leads to a shortage of conviction.
Spreading good news is a natural outflow of experiencing good news. And really, that’s all we’re talking about.
If you’re a disciple, then in some way, you’re experiencing good news.
Naturally, you’re going to share that with the people around you.
Think of it this way. If you’ve struggled with depression,
but you finally found a therapist that helped you and changed your life, and
then you met another person struggling with depression, would it take courage
to suggest to this person the same solution that already worked for you? No, of
course not. All it would take is a conviction that your therapy was what really
did the trick, and some enthusiasm about how your life has changed. But many of
us lack that conviction, don’t we. We’re not sure if our lives are any
different from anybody else’s, and some of us are not sure if we’re any
different than who we were. If we’ve followed Jesus since we were four years
old, what can we compare it to? Maybe our lives were never horrible, and they’ve
always been generally okay, but we still have loads of baggage: anger,
bitterness, confusion, discontent, hatred, sorrow, and all manner of issues
plaguing us, just like they plague the rest of the world. We hesitate to
evangelize, to spread good news, when we’re not sure how good it is.
The problem is not about your conviction of the truth of
your doctrines. When it’s only about doctrines, our fervor dies out. We might
dogmatically believe in this or that strain of Christianity for years and count
it as our duty to convince others of our own beliefs, but if we’re not
experiencing good news, our pursuit of conversion becomes empty and hollow. And
so it comes full circle, because it’s really about discipleship. And that’s all
about what we’re doing, how we’re living, and what we’re thinking, day after
day after day. It’s about living life with God day after day after day. And for
many of us, that’s what we want, but we don’t know how, or we lack the real
discipline necessary to make it happen.
It seems that many of us know all this, maybe instinctively.
We know that we just need more discipline. We know that we need to put our
faith in God and look to him for guidance, and for power, to live in his way. We
know that spiritual growth is not about praying elegant prayers or giving powerful sermons, or going to chat
rooms and arguing about our theology. We know we just need to submit to God,
live in love and consider others’ needs as well as our own. And yet we struggle
to get there. We don’t know how to defeat complacency. We don’t know how to
keep the concerns of our daily lives from choking out our spiritual
determination. We know what to do, and we want to do it deep down inside, but
we lack the will. It is in discipleship that we truly lack courage—not evangelism.
We lack the courage to sacrifice the things in our lives that are in reality
utterly worthless. Often, I lack the will to go to bed at a decent hour or to
get up out of bed to spend some time with God before my kids wake me up.
We go on and on, wondering, “what the heck is wrong with us.”
We’re in this mess, and we all know it, and we all know that we shouldn’t be
there, that God has offered us power to overcome our failures and our weaknesses.
I’m running pretty long here, so I’m going to introduce my
next topic for next week: “ It’s Messy: There’s No Formula Or Magic Key.”
Hopefully, that gets your attention without starting every word with the same
letter or something churchy like that.
But to sum up:
The balance between evangelism and discipleship is a false
dichotomy. Good evangelism can only truly flow out of good discipleship. The
truth is, a lot of us don’t really know how to do good discipleship, and when
churches try to focus on it, they don’t usually do a good job. Often they don’t
even know they’re not doing a good job. They claim to see “spiritual growth,”
but they don’t know how to measure it. So we need to really get a handle on how
to delve into life with God together, otherwise we don’t really have any good
news to talk to people about. Stay tuned for “It’s Messy”
Friday, April 13, 2012
Talking Points
I have found myself increasingly irritated with the rhetoric and distractions of politics. I know it is very difficult for politicians (and the media) to sit down and simply have a discussion about issues and answer each others' arguments with rational arguments of their own, because that's not what people think wins elections.
The most recent one I can think of is the media firestorm concerning the words of Hilary Rosen about Ann Romney.
Now, I agree that Hilary Rosen's words were ill-chosen. It is incredibly insulting to say that someone who stays at home and raises children has "never worked a day in her life" (or his?). But why, on God's green earth, must we dwell on that small phrase, out of context, and ignore the point that Rosen was trying to make. If one listens to the whole segment, it is easy to see that, in context, even the statement itself was not supposed to be a jab at Ann Romney's choice to stay at home and raise children: Rosen wasn't calling her lazy, and she wasn't suggesting that all women should join the workforce. She was clearly saying that Mitt Romney has no business seeking counsel about women's economic issues from his wife, since Ann Romney has no idea what it's like to struggle economically. She didn't have to worry about how to feed her children or about scrounging up the money for a baby-sitter or about paying the rent, all while raising a family. Many women do this on their own! Many stay-at-home moms have these same concerns for their families, but Ann Romney never has.
The only person I heard try to address these concerns, if only for a moment, was Ann Romney herself. She claims that she has been on the campaign trail, that she's been listening to the concerns of women. The real question is, does Mitt Romney's economic policies address these same concerns? Does Obama's? That is what the conversation should be about.
Personally, I agree that it is not enough for Romney to consult his wife about these issues. He needs people around him who are actively involved in working out solutions to women's issues if he wants any claim at all to working on those. He can't cite his wife as an expert, because she's not one, despite all of her good qualities. That doesn't mean her opinions don't matter, nor is it proof that she's wrong on any of the issues.
Of course, of course, of course, this is not the only issue where people are missing the real conversation, and Democrats do it as often as Republicans. We need some way of actually talking about these issues that gets past talking points and distracting rhetoric. Rhetoric is, in my opinion, the opposite of reasonable dialogue. It is trying to get someone to agree with you by being clever with words and knowing how to shift focus. It is not a way of winning an argument, nor is it in any way helpful in finding helpful solutions or appropriate answers.
The most recent one I can think of is the media firestorm concerning the words of Hilary Rosen about Ann Romney.
Now, I agree that Hilary Rosen's words were ill-chosen. It is incredibly insulting to say that someone who stays at home and raises children has "never worked a day in her life" (or his?). But why, on God's green earth, must we dwell on that small phrase, out of context, and ignore the point that Rosen was trying to make. If one listens to the whole segment, it is easy to see that, in context, even the statement itself was not supposed to be a jab at Ann Romney's choice to stay at home and raise children: Rosen wasn't calling her lazy, and she wasn't suggesting that all women should join the workforce. She was clearly saying that Mitt Romney has no business seeking counsel about women's economic issues from his wife, since Ann Romney has no idea what it's like to struggle economically. She didn't have to worry about how to feed her children or about scrounging up the money for a baby-sitter or about paying the rent, all while raising a family. Many women do this on their own! Many stay-at-home moms have these same concerns for their families, but Ann Romney never has.
The only person I heard try to address these concerns, if only for a moment, was Ann Romney herself. She claims that she has been on the campaign trail, that she's been listening to the concerns of women. The real question is, does Mitt Romney's economic policies address these same concerns? Does Obama's? That is what the conversation should be about.
Personally, I agree that it is not enough for Romney to consult his wife about these issues. He needs people around him who are actively involved in working out solutions to women's issues if he wants any claim at all to working on those. He can't cite his wife as an expert, because she's not one, despite all of her good qualities. That doesn't mean her opinions don't matter, nor is it proof that she's wrong on any of the issues.
Of course, of course, of course, this is not the only issue where people are missing the real conversation, and Democrats do it as often as Republicans. We need some way of actually talking about these issues that gets past talking points and distracting rhetoric. Rhetoric is, in my opinion, the opposite of reasonable dialogue. It is trying to get someone to agree with you by being clever with words and knowing how to shift focus. It is not a way of winning an argument, nor is it in any way helpful in finding helpful solutions or appropriate answers.
Thursday, March 29, 2012
'Don't Do the Dew' Challenge 5
Last night, something interesting happened.
I had already had a MD earlier in the day, but the kids had just gone to bed and I really felt like having a nice cold soda. I went and got one from the fridge, and it was cold and incredibly appealing (i don't always have cold cans, but I had put one in the fridge for the next day). I had it out on the desk with the full intention of drinking it. But when it came to actually doing the deed, I ended up just looking at it, and with great difficulty, I felt compelled to ignore it, even though I had not set that intention. After many days of convincing myself that "too much" mountain dew was something I should resist, I felt the same compulsion without meaning to.
So, I think that's something great, and I'm looking forward to discovering more exciting results.
I had already had a MD earlier in the day, but the kids had just gone to bed and I really felt like having a nice cold soda. I went and got one from the fridge, and it was cold and incredibly appealing (i don't always have cold cans, but I had put one in the fridge for the next day). I had it out on the desk with the full intention of drinking it. But when it came to actually doing the deed, I ended up just looking at it, and with great difficulty, I felt compelled to ignore it, even though I had not set that intention. After many days of convincing myself that "too much" mountain dew was something I should resist, I felt the same compulsion without meaning to.
So, I think that's something great, and I'm looking forward to discovering more exciting results.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
'Don't Do the Dew' Challenge 4
So here I am. It's been some time now since I started. To fill in those who have not read my previous posts on "Don't do the Dew,'...
read my previous posts on 'Don't do the Dew.'
There.
Now,
I'd like to share some thoughts I've had since an incident about a week ago. I was at home and I had neglected to take out my signature can of mountain dew for resisting purposes, and I had already drunk one in the late morning. So it is afternoon, and I think to myself, "Hey. Self. I kind of feel like having another Dew." Then my self gets a little uncomfortable and says, "But I thought we were limiting it to just one a day." And I think to myself. "Well, yeah, but we're not being strict about it. The point of the limit isn't to get all bogged down with rules and regulations. The whole point is to stay within reason and resist having more than one so that I don't lose control. But once in a while is alright." So my self said, "Fine. But you're not having any more than that, and you can't do this every day." "Of course," I said to myself and proceeded to grab and quickly devour another Dew.
The second Dew was DEWlicious (Wow, I'm in a strange mood right now.), and it didn't seem like quite enough to whet my appetite. It wasn't long before I craved a third, but of course my self was adamant, and thankfully I kept myself under control.
A couple of thoughts about this:
First, ever since that day, and especially in the couple of days following, it has been harder to resist opening a second can of Dew. As the old expression goes, "give them an inch..." Bending the rules just that little bit has done something to my sense of control. I'm still keeping it under control, but it's harder, because something went on mentally that changed things. Maybe not everyone is like this, but if I'm committed to a certain rule, I'm able to follow it to the letter. But once I justify bending the rules just a little, something shifts and I start to recognize the rule as malleable, bendable. It suddenly changes from something solid and firm to something a little wobbly and frail. Now this could either speak to the importance of respecting rules, or to the weakness of a human mind which cannot seem to do anything in a decent, healthy and good way without some strictures. Either we need an ethic which binds us to strict rules, or we need more strength of will. So which should I implement. If it is the latter, how can I really push myself to desire what is good and healthy instead of what is destructive or unhealthy? Because that's what it's about. It's not just about resisting bad things. It's about wanting good things, too.
Secondly, and this is interesting, I made this lapse in judgment at a time when I didn't have it right in front of me. I decided I wanted something without it being there. Every other time, when I've carried it with me and set it in front of me on the table, I've been able to resist, despite this pulling feeling borne of habit and want. But the can in front of me was also my reminder of resistance. This is something I think I like: for anyone wanting to resist something they can't seem to control, I truly believe now that a reminder is a good thing. If you are tempted by anything at all, it is easy to forget all the reasons why you shouldn't give in, but if you had a reminder right in front of you, then it can help to exert greater control over your mind. Why should you resist your temptation? If you don't know why, then I don't think you're ever going to get the strength to do it. If you forget the reasons, then you need a reminder, at least until it sinks in and your resistance has become a habit, and your goals and priorities have become ingrained in your mind.
Those are my thoughts over the past week or so.
read my previous posts on 'Don't do the Dew.'
There.
Now,
I'd like to share some thoughts I've had since an incident about a week ago. I was at home and I had neglected to take out my signature can of mountain dew for resisting purposes, and I had already drunk one in the late morning. So it is afternoon, and I think to myself, "Hey. Self. I kind of feel like having another Dew." Then my self gets a little uncomfortable and says, "But I thought we were limiting it to just one a day." And I think to myself. "Well, yeah, but we're not being strict about it. The point of the limit isn't to get all bogged down with rules and regulations. The whole point is to stay within reason and resist having more than one so that I don't lose control. But once in a while is alright." So my self said, "Fine. But you're not having any more than that, and you can't do this every day." "Of course," I said to myself and proceeded to grab and quickly devour another Dew.
The second Dew was DEWlicious (Wow, I'm in a strange mood right now.), and it didn't seem like quite enough to whet my appetite. It wasn't long before I craved a third, but of course my self was adamant, and thankfully I kept myself under control.
A couple of thoughts about this:
First, ever since that day, and especially in the couple of days following, it has been harder to resist opening a second can of Dew. As the old expression goes, "give them an inch..." Bending the rules just that little bit has done something to my sense of control. I'm still keeping it under control, but it's harder, because something went on mentally that changed things. Maybe not everyone is like this, but if I'm committed to a certain rule, I'm able to follow it to the letter. But once I justify bending the rules just a little, something shifts and I start to recognize the rule as malleable, bendable. It suddenly changes from something solid and firm to something a little wobbly and frail. Now this could either speak to the importance of respecting rules, or to the weakness of a human mind which cannot seem to do anything in a decent, healthy and good way without some strictures. Either we need an ethic which binds us to strict rules, or we need more strength of will. So which should I implement. If it is the latter, how can I really push myself to desire what is good and healthy instead of what is destructive or unhealthy? Because that's what it's about. It's not just about resisting bad things. It's about wanting good things, too.
Secondly, and this is interesting, I made this lapse in judgment at a time when I didn't have it right in front of me. I decided I wanted something without it being there. Every other time, when I've carried it with me and set it in front of me on the table, I've been able to resist, despite this pulling feeling borne of habit and want. But the can in front of me was also my reminder of resistance. This is something I think I like: for anyone wanting to resist something they can't seem to control, I truly believe now that a reminder is a good thing. If you are tempted by anything at all, it is easy to forget all the reasons why you shouldn't give in, but if you had a reminder right in front of you, then it can help to exert greater control over your mind. Why should you resist your temptation? If you don't know why, then I don't think you're ever going to get the strength to do it. If you forget the reasons, then you need a reminder, at least until it sinks in and your resistance has become a habit, and your goals and priorities have become ingrained in your mind.
Those are my thoughts over the past week or so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)